Tue 10 Jun 2014
You know that moment just after you finish weaving in the last end where you lay out the project to admire your handiwork? The one where you notice a mistake right in the middle of the project? Well.
Turns out a blog post can do that, too. I went to post on Sunday about how much I liked the new colorwork decreases (I do really like them very much).
They look like flowers in their own right, don’t they? I am very glad that I decided to go down to two stitches in the decrease pattern instead of 4, because 4 stitches along the decrease line made pretty prominent stripes that I didn’t love. I’m calling that change worth the ripping and reknitting, even if it wasn’t voluntary.
In preparation for writing my blog post, I went to take a picture of the decreases. Except instead of the flowers above, what I saw was this:
Not quite so flower-y, huh?
It turns out that my colorwork pattern is off by 2 stitches on two of the decrease lines, and that’s enough to move me from little flowers to something a little less exciting. Sadly, I Â was apparently consistent within each sleeve but not from sleeve to sleeve. This means that I will have one set of decreases with flowers and one without in the front of the sweater, and a matching mismatched pair of decrease lines in the back.
I think this happened because I decided to mirror around the center, and it’s a 4-stitch repeat, which shifts everything over by two. Perfect symmetry at the button band = broken symmetry or a different stitch count across the two halves of the sweater front.
I’ve decided not to pull back again because I don’t think this will matter much in the grand scheme of things. A very detail-oriented person will notice it, but from a few steps away the difference kind of gets lost. (Or at least that’s what I’m telling myself.)
I was apparently spoiled by the slip stitch pattern that I used in the Seafoam sweater. There, I paid no attention whatsoever to the decreases, and they just worked. Next time, I’ll have to remember to swatch my transitions, too!
(Note: the title of this post is sadly apt, in a different context. Our backyard chipmunks have reappeared this year, and they have dug up and eaten each and every one of my crocus bulbs, and most of the hyacinths and snowdrops, too. Now, instead of the row of green shoots that I had a couple of months ago, I have a neat row of little holes where the flowers used to be. Apparently we’ll be re-planting this fall, and installing some chicken wire. It won’t be much use against the marauding rabbits, but at least it will protect the bulbs!)
The flowers are quite lovely. I’m sure the decreases will just fade into the rest of the sweater and you will not see them.
Chipmunks were the bane of my existence in Michigan. One of them actually hitched a ride in the moving van (something from the garage probably) to Chicago. We don’t have chipmunks in the city and a marauding cat probably found him.
I don’t see the difference – maybe if you point it out to me in person I’ll see it. And, don’t forget that when you are wearing the sweater you’ll be moving, so it will be even harder to spot a slight difference! 🙂 Keep going, I think it looks great!
The sweater is lovely! but I am writing about the critters. We have gophers here, and most bulbs are “gopher candy”. Daffodils survive and thrive. Perhaps that would work for chipmunks too…
Even though you told me about the chippies, it still makes me sigh.